Davies and Elliott (2003) state that sustainability is
the capacity to “meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability
of future generations to meet their own needs” (p. 3). This definition seems
very similar to the examples from my previous blog, however, when this
definition is examined at a deeper level it is obvious that there is no hidden
agenda of economic advancement, but simply to protect our planet so that future
generations can grow up in a safe and healthy world, with all their needs met. Also for teachers working with New Zealand's bicultural early childhood curriculum, Te Whaariki (Ministry of Education, 1996), it is important to acknowledge and implement culturally relevant practices that recognise the significant knowledge Maaori possess in regards to Papatuanuku (Duhn, 2012).
Davies and Elliott (2003) go on to right that “adults need to work with the
younger generations to empower them so that they learn to influence the
changes, and ultimately, transform the status quo” (p. 2). I believe this
statement is pivotal in the argument as to why sustainable practices must be implemented
within all early childhood services
within New Zealand.
The philosophy of a centre has an impact on how
environmental education is implemented within an early childhood centre’s
curriculum. Prince (2004) argues that sustainable practices need to be woven
into all curriculum areas of a centre, therefore making it meaningful to
children. However, what sustainability looks like within individual centres is
open to interpretation. This is due to the experience and understanding
teaching teams have surrounding sustainability and its practices. However,
Prince (2004) goes onto write that sustainability should be about “fostering .
. . a love of nature and a sense of wonder in young children” (p. 3) through
offering experiences, fostering relationships and being interconnected with the
environment.
Due to the huge targets the New Zealand government has
set in regards to sustainability, it is quite understandable that the idea of
sustainable living can be quite daunting for individuals. However, within many early childhood centres in
New Zealand small but significant steps are being taken to reduce waste and
conserve energy, this includes:
· Recycling
· Waste Management
· Reusing furniture
· Natural and reusable materials for
play
· Composting
· Saving Power
· “Green cleaning” (Kinsella, 2007, p.
16). This is the process of moving away from harsh chemicals, to using natural
resources found in most kitchens. For example, bicarb, salt, lemon and olive
oil.
· Water conservation
· Redesigning of outdoor play areas
(Kinsella, 2007)
Many centres are also becoming involved in the Enviroschools project, which offers
“support [for] children . . . to be active citizens,
contributing to ecological regeneration and the creation of healthy, resilient
and sustainable communities” (The Enviroschools Foundation, n.d.). The importance of meaningful
and hands on experiences that are available to children is also a key aspect to
install the importance of sustainable living in young children.
However, if teachers are not role modelling the above
behaviours the perception around sustainability will never change. Prince
(2004) writes that “attitudes are caught not taught” (p. 13) and stresses the
importance of teachers role modelling caring for our natural environment with
children. If this is successfully achieved imagine the working theories
children will develop of the natural environment throughout their life. This
could make a real difference for future generations. This Youtube video
demonstrates just what children can imagine and create when they have good working
theories of sustainable practices.
· Environmental Policies and play
materials that reflect this policy
· Curriculum Approaches
· Audits into waste disposal
· Play areas that emphasis sustainable
practices
· Professional development
· Join early childhood environmental
education networks
(Davies & Elliott, 2008)
I am reminded of the figures I stated in my first blog
surrounding the insignificant difference New Zealand can make in regards to
global warming. However, just like the quote from Mahatma Ghandi, I believe
this Chinese Proverb symbolises the importance of making a change now no matter
how small it may seem:
If you are thinking a year ahead, sow a seed.
If you are thinking a decade ahead, plant a
tree.
If you are thinking a century ahead, educate
the people.
(Traditional Chinese
Proverb, Author Unknown)
Author
unknown. Traditional Chinese Proverb.
Davis, J.,
& Elliott, S. (2003). Early childhood
environmental education: Making it mainstream. Watson, Australia: Early
Childhood Australia.
Duhn, I. (2012). Making 'place' for ecological sustainability in early childhood education. Environmental Education Research, 18(1), 19-29. doi: 10.1080/1354622.2011.572162
Duhn, I. (2012). Making 'place' for ecological sustainability in early childhood education. Environmental Education Research, 18(1), 19-29. doi: 10.1080/1354622.2011.572162
Kalifa, J.
[Jaina Kalifa]. (2013, April 24). Climate
changers – kids thinking big about sustainability. [Video file]. Retrieved
from http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=WhkAzAD5HdQ
Kinsella,
R. (2007). Greening services: Practical
sustainability. Watson, Australia: Early Childhood Australia.
Prince, C.
(2004). Environmental education in the
early years. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Kanuka Grove Press.
The
Enviroschools Foundation. (n.d.).
Retrieved from http://www.enviroschools.org.nz
Nicole your Blog really hit home me, I am currently compiling research on sustainability practices and implementing some practices within my field based center. I completely agree that sometimes the small changes are the ones that are needed but yet not recognised.
ReplyDeleteYour blog although is about sustainability has an underlying message much like my blog on obesity. To begin to make lifestyle changes we as teachers, the community and the collective society need to recognise the potential children have in changing the future through education and attitudes.